TEHRAN - In a commentary, Hamshahri dealt with abusing Raisi's martyrdom by Israeli enemies and mercenaries to create controversy.

It wrote: The news of the accident for the president revealed national unity in Iran from the very beginning. However, as is the case with such incidents, some media campaigns inspired by Israeli policies have also started working to take advantage of this situation, and these campaigns have intensified today with the declaration of the martyrdom of the president and his companions. This media scenario tries to deal with slanders and infighting within different groups against each other instead of strengthening unity. Improving Iran's relations with its neighbors is one of the main policies of the Raisi government and has achieved important successes in this field. The improvement of Iran's relations with the Republic of Azerbaijan has also been an example of the advancement of this policy. However, since yesterday, a Zionist media policy has been trying to distort these relations by making baseless claims without any research or evidence. The Zionist scenarios are very interested in creating instability and chaos instead of cohesion and democratic processes, and in this regard, they have put abusive and harsh messages of some groups against each other on the agenda. Dealing with this scenario is also one of the issues that political groups and people in Iran are thinking about, and God willing, with consciousness, it will fail.

Ham Mihan: Value of Chabahar for India

In a note, Ham Mihan discussed the agreement between Iran and India and the importance of Chabahar for India and wrote: India has big plans for Eurasia, and the establishment of geo-economic relations with Iran will help India get out of the situation of being confined in South Asia. However, the considerations of the United States of America regarding the control of Iran cast a shadow on this deal. India, as the fifth largest economy in the world, still wants deep economic relations with Central Asia and Eurasian countries, and this relationship is currently blocked by Pakistan, the most important enemy, and China, as the most important competitor of India. From India's point of view, Iran has emerged as a major regional power after the Gaza war, and it knows that partnership with Iran can be an alternative path. Chabahar Port is located in deep water near the Sea of Oman, and it is only 500 nautical miles away from the nearest Indian port, Kandla. In addition, Chabahar is a potential alternative to Pakistan's Gwadar port, which the Chinese are developing in the framework of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Sobh-e-No: Iran's diplomacy led to the development of relations with Azerbaijan

In a conversation with Mohsen Pakaeen, an expert on Caucasus issues, Sobh-e-No discussed the development of relations between Tehran and Baku and wrote: Two years ago, there was an attack on the Azerbaijani embassy in Tehran, and it caused the suspension of relations between Baku and Tehran. Fortunately, we see that with constructive negotiations, the communication was not interrupted and relations continued. The development of relations with Azerbaijan goes back to the meeting of Mr. Amir Abdollahian with Ilham Aliyev, which was held on the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) meeting. It was after these effective and productive meetings that the relations of the parties took the normal path. In the peaceful atmosphere, it was decided that the railway line would be laid, as well as the position of the Zangezur route in Armenia was resolved, and the Qiz Qalasi Dam was opened. After a long time, Raisi and Ilham Aliyev met at the border of the two countries and by the Aras River. It seems that this dam, apart from the economic effects, became a connecting link between Iran and Azerbaijan, and besides the water and electricity supply from this dam, we will witness the development of relations and the reopening of the Baku embassy in Tehran.

Donya-e-Eqtesad: Everything below the threshold of war

In an analysis, Donya-e-Eqtesad discussed the direct confrontation between Iran and Israel, and said: Iran's attack on Israel showed that the escalation of the decades-long conflict between Tehran and Tel Aviv moved from indirect confrontation to direct confrontation, and Tehran and Tel Aviv reached the stage of confrontation with conventional military tools. These attacks raised the possibility of a "comprehensive war" between the two sides. But despite the recent escalation of tension, some limitations were established that are determined not only by political and geostrategic considerations but also by the military balance between the parties. Domestic politics, international alliances and partnerships, and logistical challenges act as limitations to escalate tensions for both sides. However, these limitations do not prevent any of the parties from carrying out conventional attacks against independent territories and assets within the framework of the new parameters of the ongoing conflicts. There are incentives on both sides to continue their efforts below the threshold of war. But this may change.