Study Finds No Risk From Childhood Vaccinations
The group from the British Public Health Laboratory Service said that they undertook their study because some British parents' groups contend that the vaccine gives children more viruses than they can cope with, weakening their immune systems.
The findings were reported on Wednesday in ****The Archives Of Disease In Childhood****, a medical journal.
Both British and American groups skeptical about vaccinations said on Wednesday that the study, which was largely paid for by vaccine companies, missed the point.
Their contention is that the vaccine overwhelms defenses against viruses, particularly measles, and makes infants vulnerable to autism.
Vaccine experts in the United States dismissed that idea as scientifically unsound and said the study's conclusions made sense, although some were disappointed at how little data the researchers released.
Fear of the MMR vaccine in Britain is so great that immunization rates with it have dropped to 85 per cent nationally since 1998, and much lower in some areas, despite strong government endorsement of immunization.
Small, local measles outbreaks across Britain have raised alarms.
Even as he endorsed the MMR vaccine, British Prime Minister Tony Blair refused to say whether his youngest son has had the shot.
The vaccine, given in the second year of life, is made with weakened viruses. These provoke the body to produce antibodies, without actually causing disease.
The researchers looked at the medical records of all young children hospitalized in southern England for serious bacterial infections of the blood, brain stem and lungs between 1991 and 1995.
It studied those who had had an MMR inoculation in the previous three months and excluded those who had underlying immune system problems or had been hospitalized before.
Researchers concluded that immunized children actually had less risk of being hospitalized for pneumonia, meningitis, septicemia or other infections.
The results should be 'reassuring evidence for parents on the safety of MMR vaccine', said Dr Liz Miller, head of the Public Health Laboratory Service's immunization division and the lead author of the paper. 'While there were already strong scientific arguments against the idea that the immune system could be overloaded, our study provides direct evidence that this does not occur.'
Dr. Neal Halsey, director of the Institute for Vaccine Safety at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, called the study 'well done, with appropriate methods'.
But groups skeptical of the vaccine on both sides of the Atlantic demurred.
Pediatric neurologist Marcel Kinsbroune, who advises the National Vaccine Information Center, which considers some vaccines unsafe, conceded that the study showed that vaccinated children's immune systems do not collapse. But he said: "The serious allegations against MMR have nothing to do with bacterial infections; they have to do with intestinal inflammation and autism". He added: "The smoking gun is that measles vaccine is in the lining of your gut years later." (AP)